Download PGN of September ’25 Anti-Sicilian games
>> Previous Update >>
Alapin 2.c3: 2..Nf6 3.e5 Nd5 4.Nf3 Nc6 5.Bc4 [B22]
This tournament saw a couple of interesting games in this line, including a very tense game on board 1, battling it out for a spot in the candidates. Stakes were high in Nihal, S - Firouzja, A, where Black continued 5..Nb6 6.Bb3 d5 7.exd6 c4:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7.Bc2 Qxd6 8.0-0 g6. The seemingly quiet position quickly turned to chaos after Nihal sacrificed a piece for long-term play, though Firouzja held on and eventually came out on top.
The same variation appeared on a lower board in the very first round between Suleymanli, A - Karthikeyan, M where Black opted for 8..Bg4 instead. White played astonishingly well in this game, which turned out to be a true masterclass!
Rossolimo 3..e6: 4.Bxc6 bxc6 [B30]
For the first of our 2..e6 Rossolimos, we’ll see a familiar face in a familiar line: 5.b3 f6 6.0-0 Nh6 7.d4:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ring any bells? Indeed, we saw two games between Aronian and Caruana in this line in a recent update. This time, he’s at it again in Aronian, L - Oparin, G. Black did not follow Caruana footsteps and opted for 7..cxd4?!, which White duly punished.
In a much less convincing display, White attempted 5.e5 in Hammer, J - Sadhwani, R. Black immediately equalises after 5..f6 6.Nf3 fxe5:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
though White did get the upper hand from the opening after some impressive positional play, before ultimately stumbling and losing.
Rossolimo 3..e6: 4.0-0 Nge7 5.d4 cxd4 6.Nxd4 Qb6 [B30]
This line has been quite fashionable lately, though these two games point to the fact that Black might have it all figured out by now.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Both our games continued 7.Nxc6 bxc6 8.Be2 Ng6 9.c4 Be7 10.Nc3 0-0 11.Rb1:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
when Matlakov, M - Gelfand, B continued 11..c5 12.Be3 Qc7 13.f4, whereas Volokitin, A - Aditya, M went 11..Qc7 12.Be3 Rd8 13.Qd2 a5N.
White didn’t achieve much in either games and, frankly, these make me want to play this line with Black! I don’t think this is how White achieves an edge these days.
Rossolimo 3..g6: 4.0-0 Bg7 and 5..e5 [B31]
Another structure we’ve looked into recently. After the quiet 5.d3 e5, White attempted 6.a3 Nge7 7.b4:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
in Ivic, V - Madaminov, M. I really liked White’s approach, bizarrely swapping both bishops off after 7..d6 8.bxc5 dxc5 9.Bg5 Bd7 10.Bxc6 Bxc6 11.Bxe7. White proceeded to place a knight on d5 with a comfortable position.
In a similar but different line, Vachier Lagrave, M - Praggnanandhaa, R battled it out over 5.Re1 e5 6.Bxc6 dxc6 7.d3 Qe7 8.a3 Nf6 9.b4:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Black was well prepared and White simply had nothing to fight with. An easy draw, and another line to avoid for White.
Till next time, Ezra
>> Previous Update >>
Please post you queries on the Anti-Sicilians Forum, or subscribers can write to me at support@ChessPublishing.com if you have any questions or queries.