Download PGN of May ’25 Anti-Sicilian games
>> Previous Update >>
Rossolimo 3...e6: 4.Bxc6 bxc6 [B30]
I like this line, as it often leads to interesting positions, and our three games this month are no exception. Grischuk, A - Pingin, A was a creative and lively draw, where both sides tried to dodge main lines: 5.d3 Ne7 6.Nbd2
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The main action came in a double dual between two American giants, which featured the same line twice in one day. Both games followed 5.b3 f6 6.O-O Nh6 7.d4 Nf7 8.c4 cxd4 9.Nxd4 Bb4, a new position until that day!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Aronian, L - Caruana, F continued 10.Be3, and White obtained a slight advantage after some missed opportunities from Black.
In our second Aronian, L - Caruana, F, White tried 10.Bd2 to keep things new - he was heading for a 2-0 lead, but stumbled at the last hurdle.
Hybrid Variation: 3.Bb5+ Nc6 4.O-O Bd7 [B51]
Mendonca, L - Panjwani, R continued 5.Re1 a6 6.Bf1 Bg4, which is the main line. Black went for a setup with ...e6 after 7.h3 Bxf3 8.Qxf3 Nf6 9.c3 e6:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
While White won convincingly, I’m personally not convinced by 12.Qe2.
Our second game is a cautionary tale. White quickly ran out of ideas and got crushed on the queenside. Amar, E - Jacobson, B followed 5.Re1 Nf6 6.c3 a6 7.Bf1 Bg4 8.h3 Bxf3 9.Qxf3 e6 10.d3 Be7:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
11.Bf4!?, which holds some hidden subtleties.
Moscow Variation: 3...Nd7 4.c4!? [B51]
Finally, we explore a move I haven’t seen before: 4.c4. Though this move won’t revolutionise the Moscow Variation, it can give Black a little extra something to think about.
Our first two games in this line went 4...Ngf6 5.Nc3 g6 6.d3 Bg7 7.h3 O-O:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8.Ba4 (avoiding 8...Nb6). Andersen, M - Zilka, S was fairly one-sided as Black struck with 8...a6 and an early ...b5.
Popov, I - Parpiev, I was a little more quiet, as Black opted for the less offensive 8...b6. I would personally recommend the 8...a6 approach.
Black opted for a different setup in Suyarov, M - Madaminov, M, after 5...a6 6.Ba4 e6:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
After analysing this game, I think White should play with d4 in these positions, but White chose the more flexible structures with d3, when Black had very good chances in the opening.
Till next time, Ezra
>> Previous Update >>
Please post you queries on the Anti-Sicilians Forum, or subscribers can write to me at support@ChessPublishing.com if you have any questions or queries.