Download PGN of September ’25 1 d4 d5 2 c4 games
>> Previous Update >>
Queen’s Gambit Accepted with 7.Nc3 [D27]
It came as quite a shock to me that 1.d4 d5 2.c4 dxc4 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.e3 e6 5.Bxc4 c5 6.0-0 a6 and now 7.Nc3 is a dangerous line, but I couldn’t help but notice that Alexey Sarana and Ivan Ivanisevic had been wielding it very effectively. The point is that after 7...b5 8.Bb3 Bb7, White can just play 9.e4!:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
when it’s not at all healthy for Black to take the e4 pawn (see Ivanisevic, I - Kaufman, L).
Black’s most principled approach is to play 9...cxd4 10.Nxd4 Nbd7:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
when White can choose between 11.Re1 (Sarana, A - Nihal, S) and 11.Be3 (Korobov, A - Poetsch, H). Black should be OK if he defends himself accurately, but in practice it’s easy to go wrong.
A solid way to play it is with 10...Nc6, as in Indjic, A - Neiksans, A. White should have a slight pull, but with accurate defence Black should eventually equalize.
The transpositional possibilities make 7.Nc3 an interesting line to have in your repertoire, especially because many players will still underestimate it.
Main Slav Defence 5.a4 Bf5 6.Ne5 Nbd7 7.Nxc4, Sokolov’s 7...Nb6 [D17]
Ivan Sokolov’s line of the Slav (1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.Nc3 dxc4 5.a4 Bf5 6.Ne5 Nbd7 7.Nxc4 Nb6) has a reputation for being rock solid, and it has also been taking over from the sharper 7...Qc7. I noticed that in Harikrishna, P - Maghsoodloo, P, Black played the rare 9...g6:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
and then 13...e6 was the official ‘new move’. To me it just looks like another way to sit there and hope that White can’t do much to use his space advantage.
There was another instance of an early ...g6 in Wojtaszek, R - Korobov, A, this time after 8.e3 (instead of 8.Ne5.)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In this game Black’s 11...e5 break looked interesting, but the position looks difficult for Black after 13.e6 instead of 13.f4. In fact, it all seemed rather scrappy until Korobov’s beautiful final attack, starting with 32...Nxg2!!.
Samadov, R - Mamedov, R and Makarian, R - Kokarev, D were more traditional examples of the unusual 8.e3, Samadov abandoned any winning efforts quite early whilst Makarian ground on for 97 moves! This is a good illustration of how to win against Sokolov’s line, you need persistence and energy.
See you next month! Nigel
>> Previous Update >>
If you have any questions, then please post a message at the 1 d4 d5 Forum, or subscribers can email support@chesspublishing.com.